Legal Opinion
State Ex Inf. Dalton v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided July 28, 1954No. 44390PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHollingsworth, J.
This is an original information in quo warranto brought by the Attorney General against respondent Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of Kansas City, hereinafter referred to as “Authority”, and against respondent City of Kansas City, hereinafter referred to as “the City”. The information challenges the constitutionality of the Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority Law (Laws of Missouri, 1951, pages 300-323; 1953 Cum. Supp., RSMo 1949, §§ 99.300 through 99.660, V.A.M.S.) and also challenges the legality of various activities of respondents which have been taken or are planned…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Cincinnati v. VesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Aaron v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.