Legal Opinion
Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing Authority
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 22, 1954No. Appeal, No. 254PublishedCited by 194 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves as taxpayers and all other persons similarly affected, filed a complaint in equity to enjoin the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh from taking by eminent domain their properties located on a certain site selected by the Authority for a public housing project. An answer having been filed and hearing held, the Chancellor dismissed the complaint. Plaintiffs’ exceptions were dismissed by the court en bane, and from its final decree plaintiffs now appeal.
*568In August, 1949, the Housing Authority of the City of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Chapman v. Huntington, West Virginia, Housing AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
- Allydonn Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Hogue v. the Housing Auth. of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Slawek v. BD. OF MED. ED. & LICENSURESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Weber v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.