Schenck v. Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Hoeace Steen,
Because of the great importance to the City of Pittsburgh of the redevelopment project which is here under attack, and because of circumstances that require a prompt adjudication of the issue now raised as to its legality, we took original jurisdiction of these proceedings.
Plaintiff is the part owner of a property at 420-422' Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh; the intervening plaintiffs own, respectively, properties at 416-418 Penn Avenue, 427 Liberty Avenue, and 429 Liberty Avenue. Plaintiff filed the present bill in equity for an injunction against the carrying out,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Wilson v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- City of Philadelphia v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Jury v. WiestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.