Legal Opinion
Rotter v. Coconino County
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1991No. CV-90-0327-PRPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Coconino County petitioned for review from the court of appeals’ opinion allowing Franz Rotter and his corporation, South Grand Canyon Hospitality, Inc. (collectively Rotter), to expand a nonconforming use in violation of a county zoning ordinance onto an adjacent parcel first acquired by Rotter after passage of an ordinance forbidding that use. Rotter v. Coconino County, 167 Ariz. 198, 805 P.2d 1019 (Ct.App.1990). We granted review pursuant to Rule 23, Ariz. R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S., and have jurisdiction under article 6, § 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- HUMPHREYS v. Stuart Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- O'Connor v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In Re Appeal of Casella Waste Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Washburn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.