Legal Opinion

Flaherty v. Weinberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 28, 1985No. 118, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether an attorney is liable to a nonclient for professional malpractice. Because we recognize that liability may attach in certain limited circumstances and because we last examined this issue over a decade ago, see Prescott v. Coppage, 266 Md. 562, 296 A.2d 150 (1972), and because of the significant increase in case law and professional literature on attorney liability to third parties, 1 we find it useful to review the present state of the law on this subject before stating our answer.

I

A majority of American courts evidently continue to…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Penalber v. BlountSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Stratagene v. Parsons Behle & LatimerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  4. Ivan N. Schatz Joann B. Schatz v. Mark E. Rosenberg Mer Enterprises, Incorporated Stephen Jaeger Weinberg & GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API