Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Roberts

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 3, 2012No. 10-1987, 10-1988PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN and Judge GERGEL joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

In this case, an insurer sought a declaratory judgment that it was required to indemnify its insured for no more than 40 percent of a state court judgment because it had covered its insured for no more than 40 percent of the time in which the state court plaintiff was exposed to lead poisoning. The district court agreed that the insurer was responsible for only a portion of the judgment, notwithstanding the fact…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. The Walter E. Campbell Company v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. White Pine Insurance Co. v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Nautilus Ins. Co. v. 200 W. Cherry St., LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  4. Rossello v. Zurich Amer. InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. United States v. Keyon PaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API