Legal Opinion
Bradshaw v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 1948No. Civ. 7526PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
The second amended complaint in this action alleged that plaintiff acquired from one Fredrickson the right to place 50 colonies of bees on Fredrickson’s property in the Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District; that the district, in order to supply water for irrigation of the lands therein, owned and operated a ditch in which were located a headgate and dam; that immediately prior to August 14, 1947, such ditch and headgate were so badly and negligently constructed and maintained, and the water therein so negligently and carelessly attended, that the headgate broke and the water of the ditch flowed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Hall v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Spencer v. City of CalipatriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Uttley v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Baker v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- In re J. D.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973