Legal Opinion
Kittle v. Bellegarde
California Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1890No. 12873PublishedCited by 39 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing to vacate a judgment by default. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
When this action was before the Department, the following opinion was prepared by Commissioner Vanclief:—
“ This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment by default, and also from the judgment.
“The action was commenced by plaintiff’s testator September 29,1886, against J. B. Bellegarde, and against William Patterson, as superintendent of public streets, etc., of the city and county of San Francisco. The complaint is in the usual form of complaints to quiet title to land under section 738 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and seeks to have determined the adverse claim…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Head v. FordyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Taylor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Brooks v. CalderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Hearst v. EgglestoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Axtell v. GerlachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Dranga v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Chase v. City Treasurer of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Merrifield v. BucknerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Ormsby v. OttmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.