Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Riley

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1942No. L. A. 18249PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This proceeding was instituted to compel by writ of mandate certain state officials in charge of the finances of the state, respondents herein, (a) to recalculate the credits to which,. it is contended by petitioner, the County of Los Angeles is entitled to have credited to its account “upon each and every report of aid to needy children presented to the Respondents herein by said County of Los Angeles since Sep*654tember 13, 1939, and which said reports have been audited and allowed by the State Department of Social Welfare and the State Controller as proper cases of child aid; and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Board of Directors v. NyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. U'ren v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Miller v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. v. Maxwell-JollyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. California Ass'n of Nursing Homes Sanitaruims, Rest Homes & Homes for the Aged, Inc. v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API