Miller v. Pillsbury
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Industrial Accident Board of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Fred Miller, petitioner herein, applied to the respondents constituting the Industrial Accident Board of the state of California, to hear his application concerning compensation for injuries received by said Miller in the course of his duties as an employee of the state. The board refused to hear said application upon the ground that the state is not an employer bound by the provisions of the “Employers’ Liability Act.” (Stats. 1911, p. 796.) An alternative writ of mandate was issued in which the board was required to hear Miller’s application or to show cause why such action should not be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Melvin v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bourn v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kleban v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Texas Prison Board v. CabeenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- County of Los Angeles v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hawks v. WalshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.