U'ren v. State Board of Control
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Supérior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Robert W. Harrison, Deputy Attorney-General, and Sullivan, Sullivan & Theo. J. Roche, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment ordering the issuance of a writ of mandate directed to the defendants, the State Board of Control, and also the members of said board, requiring them to audit and allow the claim of the plaintiff against the state treasury for the sum of two hundred dollars for his salary as an employee of the California State Conservation Commission for the month of July, 1912. Concerning the facts of the case there is no material dispute. .The plaintiff, who is an attorney at law, was employed on or about July 1,1911, by the California State Conservation Commission under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sullivan v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Lewis v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Scott v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lawrence v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by16 opinions
- California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Millholen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Tirapelle v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- City of Oakland v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.