State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This action is brought by the controller of the state of California, acting under and by virtue of authority conferred upon him by section 3773 of the Political Code, to secure the possession of, and the rents, issues, and profits derived from, certain mining properties described in the complaint. Plaintiff alleges that the state of California ever since July 12, 1910, has been the owner of the real property described in the complaint, “being the same land conveyed by Louis Cadematori, Tax Collector of Calaveras County, State of California, to the State of California, on the 12th day of July,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Asociacion De Reclamantes v. The United Mexican StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.