Legal Opinion
Reinbold v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1976No. Civ. 48444PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.
On January 28, 1975, one year after appellant was retired from the City of Santa Monica, he filed a petition for a writ of mandate for damages, and to compel respondents to include him under, and provide him with, the benefits of resolution No. 4413. Resolution No. 4413 ratified a memorandum of understanding (hereinafter MOU) dated August 1973, executed between the City of Santa Monica (hereinafter “City”) and the Santa Monica Police Officers’ Association (hereinafter “SMPOA”). Appellant, who is the ex-police chief of the City, also sought to compel the City to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Elmore v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Covina-Azusa Fire Fighters Union, Local 2415 v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- National City Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of National CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Weary v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Bradshaw v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.