Legal Opinion
National City Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of National City
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 2, 2001No. D035158PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.—
Summary
Under a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between plaintiff National City Police Officers’ Association (the association) and defendant City of National City (the city), each year police officers are permitted to sell back up to 40 hours of unused vacation time. Separate provisions of the MOU require that in addition to their hourly base pay officers receive incentive pay or differential pay when they are engaged in certain activities, have certain skills or have extended of years of service with the city. Under the terms of the MOU these incentives and differentials…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- City of El Cajon v. El Cajon Police Officers' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Reinbold v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Monaco v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- San Diego City Firefighters v. Board of Administration of San Diego City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. City of ReddingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.