Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided March 31, 2003No. 00-2923 MA/BREPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF LACH-ES, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO LIMIT THE TEMPORAL SCOPE, AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO LIMIT MONETARY RELIEF
MAYS, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss based on laches or to limit the temporal scope or to limit monetary relief filed on April 15, 2002. 1 Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “EEOC” or the “Commission”) responded to Defendant’s motion on May 15, 2002. For the following reasons, the court DENIES Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Occidental Life Insurance v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PBM Graphics Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Global Horizons, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Propak Logistics, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2012
- D.B. v. CorrectHealth East Baton Rouge, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.