Legal Opinion
Brush v. Apartment & Hotel Financing Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1927No. Docket No. 4848PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
— This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver in an action brought to foreclose a mortgage of a leasehold on an apartment house, together with the furniture and furnishings therein contained.
It is contended by appellant that the court abused its discretion in making the appointment and that the court was without jurisdiction in the premises.
By subdivision 2 of section 564 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is provided in effect that a receiver may be appointed by the court in an action by a mortgagee for the foreclosure of his mortgage “ . . . where it appears . . . that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Whitley v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Fox v. FloodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- McCarthy v. KurkjianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Jay v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Snidow v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Golden State Glass Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.