Legal Opinion

Helton v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2009No. 20S04-0901-PC-41PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief. The petitioner al*1022leges that defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to move to suppress evidence prior to his guilty plea. The petitioner did not establish what other evidence of guilt was or was not available. He therefore failed to meet his burden of proof to establish that he was prejudiced by counsel's alleged omission.

Facts and Procedural History

In August 2002 Elkhart law enforcement obtained a warrant to search petitioner James Helton's residence. The warrant was based on a probable cause…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Patrick Hampton v. Blair LeibachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Boggs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Anthony Hollowell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Trondo L. Humphrey v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Wayne A. Campbell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Shaun Pierce v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API