Legal Opinion
State v. Higgins
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 2004No. 20030320PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appealed a district court order denying its motion to amend a criminal complaint, granting Randy Brian Higgins’s motion to suppress evidence, and granting Higgins’s motion to dismiss. We reverse and remand.
I
[¶ 2] At 10:30 p.m. on July 12, 2003, Higgins received a citation alleging he committed “the following offense: Operate a motorboat while under the influence in violation of Sec. 20.1-13-07 NDCC ... in violation of Governor’s boating proclamation.”
[¶ 3] Higgins filed a motion to dismiss or suppress evidence. Higgins asserted in his supporting…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. KennerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Fargo Bottling Works Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Scott v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. LohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Holbach v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Harter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BachmeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. StensakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.