Legal Opinion

State v. Loh

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2000No. 20000095PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Wayne J. Loh appeals from his judgment of conviction, raising the issue of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing the law enforcement officer did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion to justify stopping Loh’s vehicle. We affirm, concluding the officer had probable cause to conduct the investigatory vehicle stop.

I

[¶ 2] On May 6, 1999, at around 9:30 p.m., a law enforcement officer noticed Loh’s vehicle traveling slowly, confirmed by radar to be traveling 32 miles per hour in a 55-mph zone. The officer followed the vehicle for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. HawleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Zimmerman v. North Dakota Department of Transportation DirectorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. KennerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of Jamestown v. JeromeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lapp v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. FasteenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. HigginsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Gabel v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API