Legal Opinion

Harter v. North Dakota Department of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2005No. 20040281PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Clayton Harter appeals the district court’s judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation (“Department”) hearing officer’s decision to suspend his driving privileges for 91 days, arguing North Dakota statutory law does not provide for such a suspension and any ambiguities in the law should be construed against the Department and in favor of Harter. We find the statute provides for the suspension and the criminal rule of lenity does not apply in civil matters. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Harter was stopped for speeding, making loud acceleration sounds, and crossing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Public Service Commission v. Wimbledon Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. LaibNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Erickson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. HigginsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Brewer v. ZieglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. GO Committee Ex Rel. Hale v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Estate of KimbrellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. WetzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API