Legal Opinion
State v. Fargo Bottling Works Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1910PublishedCited by 35 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Cass county; Pollock, J. The Fargo Bottling Works Company, a corporation, was convicted of the wrongful sale of intoxicating liquor in violation of the prohibitory law, and it appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEllsworth, J.
At its session in 1909 the Legislative Assembly of North Dakota passed an act, the wording of which, including the title, is as follows:
“An act to amend section 9366 of the Revised Codes of North Dakota, as amended by chapter 191 of the Laws of 1907, defining intoxicating liquors.”
“Be it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of the state of North Dakota:
“ ‘Sec. 9366. Intoxicating liquor defined. The following liquors are hereby declared to be intoxicating and their intoxicating quality shall, by all courts, be presumed, viz.: Alcohol, whisky, rum, brandy, beer, ale, porter, wine and hard cider,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- State v. DureinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Erickson v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. HogieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Schmitt v. F. W. Cook Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re SpeerIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. HigginsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.