Legal Opinion

Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2005No. 20050103PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] David B. Gray appealed from a judgment1 affirming the North Dakota Game and Fish Department’s order suspending Gray’s hunting, fishing, and trapping privileges in North Dakota from September 21, 2004, through January 1, 2006. We conclude Gray has failed to establish that his statutory or constitutional rights were violated by the Department’s suspension of his hunting privileges in North Dakota on the basis of his violation of a Wyoming hunting law, and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On April 16, 2004, Gray, a North Dakota resident, was convicted by a Wyoming circuit court jury of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gabel v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hollingsworth v. HollingsworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Forbes v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API