Legal Opinion

Scott v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1998No. Civil 980188PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Glen Scott appeals from a judgment affirming the order of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau denying further benefits. We conclude the Bureau improperly allowed ex parte contacts between its outside counsel and the Bureau officer who issued the decision in this case, and accordingly we reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] Scott suffered a work-related injury in March 1995 and sought workers compensation benefits. In May 1995, Scott and his wife purchased Knife River Trading Post, a combination convenience store, gas station, and restaurant. Scott has worked at the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Heck v. ReedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Frank Camero v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Madison v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Harold J. Sullivan v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Douville v. Pembina County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kraft v. North Dakota State Board of NursingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HigginsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API