Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sanderson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 23, 2019No. 3ag/18PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGetty, J.

Pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-721, Bar Counsel filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action ("Petition") against Respondent, Garland Montgomery Jarrat Sanderson, in this Court on March 26, 2018. In the Petition, Bar Counsel charged Mr. Sanderson with multiple violations of the Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct, 1 throughout his representation of several clients, including: (i) MLRPC 1.1 (Competency); (ii) MLRPC 1.2 (Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and Attorney); (iii) MLRPC 1.3 (Diligence); (iv) MLRPC 1.4 (Communication); (v) MLRPC 1.5…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Attorney Grievance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Attorney Grievance v. Smith-ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Attorney Grievance v. AmbeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. Attorney Grievance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API