Attorney Grievance v. Ambe
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Jude Ambe, Misc. Docket AG No. 21, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Barbera, CJ. ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT — DISCIPLINE — DISBARMENT — Respondent Jude Ambe violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-301.1, 19- 301.2, 19-301.3, 19-301.4, 19-301.5, 19-301.15, 19-301.16, 19-303.3, 19-308.1, and 19- 308.4. These violations principally arose from Respondent’s inexcusable failure to appear in court; various material misrepresentations to a tribunal and Bar Counsel; neglect of his client’s case; and failure to properly maintain client funds…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. HoeraufCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. TatungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance v. NeverdonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.