Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Ambe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 21, 2019No. 21ag/18PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Jude Ambe, Misc. Docket AG No. 21, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Barbera, CJ. ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT — DISCIPLINE — DISBARMENT — Respondent Jude Ambe violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-301.1, 19- 301.2, 19-301.3, 19-301.4, 19-301.5, 19-301.15, 19-301.16, 19-303.3, 19-308.1, and 19- 308.4. These violations principally arose from Respondent’s inexcusable failure to appear in court; various material misrepresentations to a tribunal and Bar Counsel; neglect of his client’s case; and failure to properly maintain client funds…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Attorney Grievance v. HoeraufCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Attorney Grievance v. TatungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Attorney Grievance v. NeverdonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API