Legal Opinion
Seattle Security Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 9, 1999No. 99-139CPublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This post-award bid protest action is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. At issue is whether defendant acted arbitrarily and capriciously, and contrary to law, in evaluating plaintiffs past performance for purposes of awarding the contract. After careful consideration of the briefs filed by the parties, the oral argument, and for the reasons discussed below, the court GRANTS plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record and DENIES defendant’s motion for judgment on the administrative record. The court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Textron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- PGBA, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.