Legal Opinion
Fox v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 7, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-0446-RPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MERHIGE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Deputy United States Marshals for the Eastern District of Virginia, bring this action under the Tuckér Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2) to recover overtime compensation allegedly due them under 5 U.S.C. § 5542. The action is brought pursuant to Rule 23, Fed.R.Civ.P. on behalf of all persons who are now or have been Deputy United States Marshals for the Eastern District of Virginia for the six years immediately preceding October 21, 1974. Jurisdiction is attained pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2). The Court has taken evidence, considered the arguments…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- John Burich v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Baylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Byrnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bennett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Buchan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Carter v. GibbsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1988
- Sullivan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Manning v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.