Legal Opinion

Carter v. Gibbs

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 8, 1988No. CV 87-4897-HLH (Tx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

HUPP, District Judge.

I

On July 28, 1987 plaintiffs filed this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. (FLSA), for recovery of overtime pay. Named plaintiffs are seven Revenue Officers, employed by the Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, at Grades 11 and 12. All are members of the National Treasury and Employees Union, and are subject to a collective bargaining agreement entered into between the union and the government.

Since the complaint has been filed, almost 300 federal employees have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API