Legal Opinion

Byrnes v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 15, 1963No. Nos. 55-60, 97-60, 171-60, 323-60, 496-59PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURFEE, Judge.

These five cases, consolidated for trial, present the claims of 65 investigators of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division, Internal Revenue Service, for overtime compensation under the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945, 59 Stat. 295 (1945), as amended. The actual performance by a number of plaintiffs of work outside or, in addition to, the normal workweek of five eight-hour days, is not in dispute. The principal issue is whether the extra hours actually worked were officially ordered or approved within the meaning of the statute and pertinent regulations.

Section 201 of the Act…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  2. Falcon Dam Constructors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Baylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Francis M. Fix v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. McQuown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Bilello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API