Herz v. Ransom
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
-The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant to recover a commission under an oral contract. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.
The appellant in his brief has moved that certain portions of the statement of facts be stricken. The respondent has countered with a motion that the entire statement of facts be stricken.
The case presents a somewhat unusual, though not entirely novel, situation. Trial was had before the late esteemed Judge Mitchell Gilliam on January 14, 1931. Findings of fact,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grays Harbor Boom Co. v. LownsdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Petro Paint Manufacturing Co. v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bales v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Puget Sound National Bank of Tacoma v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Snodderly v. BrothertonWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Grimes v. FraserWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Rockwell v. PeyranWashington Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.