Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Fraser

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1934No. 25115. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Respondents commenced this action to recover damages, personal and property, resulting from an automobile collision. Appellants denied liabil ity and, in turn, cross-complained for damages to their car. Trial before the court without a jury resulted in findings, conclusions and judgment in favor of the respondents and against the appellants.

The assignments of error relate to the negligence of appellants and the contributory negligence of respondents.

The accident out of which this litigation arose occurred October 18, 1932, at about 6:15 o’clock p. m., on the Inland Empire highway No. 3, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petro Paint Manufacturing Co. v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Herz v. RansomWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Strong v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glick v. RopesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. McLean v. Continental Baking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Kelly v. BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Wool Growers Service Corp. v. Simcoe Sheep Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API