Bales v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
The plaintiff, the operator of a fish hatchery located about a quarter of a mile south of the city limits of Tacoma, brought this action against the city to recover damages for the loss of fish through alleged contamination of the waters of a stream feeding his hatchery, and to enjoin the continuation of the alleged nuisance causing the contamination. Issues having been joined, the case was tried before the court, sitting without a jury, resulting in a judgment for damages and a decree awarding plaintiff injunctive relief. The city has appealed.
Relieved of the detail disclosed by the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Smith v. City of SedaliaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Attorney General ex rel. Township of Wyoming v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Larson v. Union Investment & Loan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Town of Shelby v. Cleveland Mill & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Coney v. Lihue Plantation Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1951
- Goggin v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Ellison v. Rayonier IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.