Legal Opinion

Snodderly v. Brotherton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1933No. 24314. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an action in replevin, brought on behalf of a minor, by his guardian, against the defendant to recover possession of a truck formerly owned by the minor and traded in by him as part of the purchase price of a new automobile; damages for detention of the truck are also sought in the complaint. The original transaction between the parties was evi- deuced by a conditional sale contract wbicb tbe minor subsequently elected to disaffirm, preparatory to the bringing of tbis action. Tbe cause was tried before tbe court, without a jury, resulting in findings of fact and conclusions of law…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herz v. RansomWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Imperial Motors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lubin v. CowellWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hines v. CheshireWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lakey v. CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Wise v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API