Petro Paint Manufacturing Co. v. Taylor
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This action was brought by respondent, Petro Paint Manufacturing Company, as plain tiff, to foreclose liens for material alleged to have been furnished respondent Taylor, who was then the owner of the premises, in the construction of five certain dwelling houses situated in King county. Appellant cross-complained to foreclose liens upon the same properties. One of the properties is not involved in this appeal. The other properties, properly described in the pleadings and findings, are referred to on appeal as house No. 1, house No. 2, house No. 3 and house No. 4.
Taylor was not only the owner…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rieflin v. GraftonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Bellingham Bay Land Co. v. DibbleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Bradley v. Donovan-Pattison Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Osten v. CurtisWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Rose v. O'ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Intermountain Electric, Inc. v. G-A-T Bros. Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Intermountain Elec., Inc. v. GAT BROS. CONST., INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Tackett v. MilburnWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Bleiler v. WolffWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.