Legal Opinion
Anderson First Coalition v. City of Anderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 2005No. C047605PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
In this action under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.; hereinafter CEQA) and planning and zoning law, plaintiffs, which comprise the Anderson First Coalition, along with two individuals, Kathy Grissom and John Wade (collectively, Anderson Coalition or the Coalition), challenge the approval by the City Council of the City of Anderson (collectively City) of a shopping center project. The project is anchored by a Wal-Mart Supercenter store (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart or Wal-Mart Supercenter), Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- City of Marina v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Preserve Poway v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- South Orange County Wastewater Authority v. City of Dana PointCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- California Clean Energy Committee v. City of WoodlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Harrington v. City of Davis, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.