Legal Opinion
Harrington v. City of Davis
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided October 20, 2017No. C081263PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRenner, J.
*423Defendants and respondents the City of Davis (City) and the City Council of the City of Davis (City Council) approved a conditional use permit authorizing the use of a single family home in a residential zoning district as professional office space for three therapists. Petitioner and appellant Michael Harrington, who lives next door, filed a petition for an administrative writ of mandate asking the trial court to set aside the conditional use permit. The trial court denied the petition.
Harrington seeks review of the trial court's denial of the petition for mandate. He contends (1) the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Salazar v. EastinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Desmond v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jensen v. City of Santa Rosa, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Berkeley Hills Watershed Coal. v. City of Berkeley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Soc'y v. Cnty. of El Dorado, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund v. City of San Mateo 9/10/2 Case Details Related Case: A159658California Court of Appeal · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.