Legal Opinion

California Clean Energy Committee v. City of Woodland

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 2014No. C072033UnpublishedCited by 16 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOCH, J.

The City of Woodland (City) approved Gateway II—a project by Petrovich Development Company, EEC (Petrovich)—to develop a 234-acre regional shopping center on undeveloped agricultural land located at the City’s periphery. California Clean Energy Committee (CCEC), a California nonprofit organization, filed a petition for writ of mandate under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to challenge the City’s certification of its final EIR (environmental impact report) and approval of the project. 1 The City opposed the petition, which…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Cuenca v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Ukiah Citizens for Safety First v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Cal. Clean Energy Committee v. City of Pasadena CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. California Clean Energy Committee v. County of Placer CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API