Legal Opinion

Thomasian v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1953No. Civ. 15840PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

This proceeding involves (1) the jurisdiction, if any, of a municipal court to allow an amendment of a complaint which increases the amount of the demand beyond the $3,000 jurisdictional limit of that court, (2) the validity of the judgment rendered by the superior court, or of its appellate department, annulling, upon writ of review, the municipal court order which allowed the amendment, and (3) the jurisdiction of this court to review the action of the superior court in an original proceeding as distinguished from an appeal from the superior court judgment.

A brief summary…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ryan v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Whittaker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. BouladCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. SearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Gutierrez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API