Legal Opinion

Gillingham v. Greyhound Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1968No. Civ. 11564PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. *

In a personal injury action, Western Greyhound Lines, corporation, appeals from an order granting a new trial against Greyhound alone, after a jury had found in favor of all the defendants.

Question Presented

Should plaintiff’s prof erred instruction on last clear chance have been given t

Record

On a dark October night, a vehicle driven by Joseph Aiello struck plaintiff who was jaywalking across Highway 99, a major interstate thoroughfare, just north of the city limits of Lodi. Within seconds thereafter, a Greyhound bus driven by Harold Holston straddled the plaintiff’s motionless body…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Duncan Brothers v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fry v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Spann v. BallestyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Kimball v. WhetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API