Gillingham v. Greyhound Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
In a personal injury action, Western Greyhound Lines, corporation, appeals from an order granting a new trial against Greyhound alone, after a jury had found in favor of all the defendants.
Question Presented
Should plaintiff’s prof erred instruction on last clear chance have been given t
Record
On a dark October night, a vehicle driven by Joseph Aiello struck plaintiff who was jaywalking across Highway 99, a major interstate thoroughfare, just north of the city limits of Lodi. Within seconds thereafter, a Greyhound bus driven by Harold Holston straddled the plaintiff’s motionless body…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Duncan Brothers v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fry v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Spann v. BallestyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kimball v. WhetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970