Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Rossini

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1966No. Civ. 598PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGargano, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. The appellant brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries, resulting from an accident which occurred on September 14, 1963. The facts are substantially as follows:

The appellant, an itinerant Mexican farm laborer, was employed on the Zora Cisi Ranch which adjoins the home of the respondent, Albert Rossini, Jr. On the day of the accident appellant, with three other itinerant farm laborers, Pedro Pina, Adolph Zamorra and Zavier Zamorra, was traveling due east on Highway 108 in a farm tractor and trailer combination to a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Desherow v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Casetta v. United States Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Fry v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Beard v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Younesi v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API