Legal Opinion

Schmerling v. Injured Workers' Insurance Fund

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 6, 2001No. 1697, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND G. THIEME, Jr., Judge, Retired, Specially Assigned.

This is an appeal from summary judgment granted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County in favor of appellee, the Injured Workers’ Insurance Fund (“IWIF”). 1 Appellants Jack J. Schmerling and others alleged that appellee violated the Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act (the “Maryland Wiretap Act” or the “Act”), Md.Code (1973, 1998 Repl.Vol., 2000 Cum.Supp.), § HMDl et seq. of the Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article. They allege that IWIF, which records calls for the purposes of quality assurance, did so by using…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Williams v. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Montgomery County v. BuckmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schmerling v. Injured Workers' Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Prince George's County v. Washington Post Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Wilson v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Hams of Southern Maryland, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. State v. SerratoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API