Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
This case presents a challenge to the entry of a summary judgment in a tort action in favor of three corporate defendants who designed, manufactured, or sold an automobile “Lift Kit” device which had been installed on a motor vehicle subsequently involved in a serious two-car crash. Central to the proper disposition of the case is a provision of Maryland Code (1987 Repl.Vol.), § 22-105(c) of the Transportation Article, which specifies that a Class M (multipurpose) vehicle may not be operated on any highway in the State “with a bumper that exceeds a height of 28 inches.”
I
On…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by239 opinions
- Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Okwa v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.