Legal Opinion

Schmerling v. Injured Workers' Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 2002No. 88, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

This case requires us to consider a novel question of law with respect to the Maryland Wiretap Act, Maryland Code (1974, 1998 Repl.Vol., 2000 Supp.), § 10-401, et. seq., of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. Specifically, this Court is tasked to decide whether the recording equipment utilized by the respondent, Injured Workers’ Insurance Fund (“IWIF”), to monitor and record incoming and outgoing calls constituted “telephone equipment ... or a component thereof,” -within what is commonly known as the “telephone exemption” of the Maryland Wiretap Act. If IWIF’s…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Okwa v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Williams v. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Remsburg v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Beyer v. Morgan State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Todd v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Ross v. State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API