Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance Commissioner
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.
We granted certiorari to determine whether an insurer, under whose rate-filings the premiums of drivers who reach age sixty-five automatically increase, albeit for actuarially valid reasons, violates Maryland Code (1957, 1991 Repl.Vol.) Article 48A, section 240F of the Insurance Code. Although Article 48A, section 242 provides that all insurance rates be actuarially justified, section 240F, without reference to the justification for it, prohibits an insurer from increasing premiums for drivers sixty-five years of age and older “exclusively” because of their age. The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- State Insurance Commissioner v. National Bureau of Casualty UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.