Legal Opinion
State v. Serrato
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 18, 2007No. S-2007-280PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEWIS, Judge.
¶ 1 The case before us presents the novel question of whether judicially authorized law enforcement interceptions of Appellee’s cellular (“wireless”) communications violated the Security of Communications Act, 13 O.S.2001, §§ 176.1-176.14.
FACTS
¶ 2 By an application to the District Court of Oklahoma County, agents of the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control obtained authorization to deploy pen registers and trap and trace monitoring on specific cellular phone numbers of targets in a drug investigation. Agents then obtained multiple wiretap authorizations…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manuela Villa v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- SHARPE (PHILLIP) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2015
- SHARPE (PHILLIP) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2015