Legal Opinion
Williams v. Poulos
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 14, 1993No. 93-1366 - 93-1368, 93-1680PublishedCited by 163 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Following a six-day civil bench trial, the district court ruled that the former principal owners of Consolidated Auto Recyclers, Inc. (“CAR”), defendants Wayne Bowers, Rodney Rodrigue, and John Robichaud (hereinafter “the CAR defendants”), violated the federal and Maine anti-wiretap statutes when they intercepted and recorded telephone calls made by and to plaintiffs, who were employees or former employees of Allied Capital Corporation (“Allied”) and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates. 1 See 18 U.S.C. § 2511(l)(a) and 15 M.R.S.A. § 710(1). 2 The court also held…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Aids Action Committee of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Venegas-Hernandez v. Sonolux RecordsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.