Krych v. Mercury Casualty Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHELAN, J.
The fundamental issue on appeal is the legislative intent when in 1961 the Legislature altered the uninsured motorist insurance provision of the Insurance Code by inserting in Insurance Code, section 11580.2 as a part of the definition of an uninsured motor vehicle a requirement: “. . . that, with respect to an ‘uninsured motor vehicle’ whose owner or operator is unknown: (1) the bodily injury has arisen out of physical contact of such automobile with the insured or with an automobile which the insured is occupying.”
It is plaintiff’s claim that the requirement of physical…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Balestrieri v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Orpustan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Allen v. McMillionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Guzman v. Allstate Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1991
- Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.