Legal Opinion
Balestrieri v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Insurance
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 1975No. 11834-PRPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
Nicholas Balestrieri filed a declaratory judgment action seeking an interpretation of the applicability of the uninsured motorist endorsement contained in an automobile liability insurance policy issued by Hartford Accident and Idemnity Company. The trial court ruled that the policy conditions for recovery had not been met and that the provisions of the policy were not in conflict with the Arizona uninsured motorist statute. 7 A.R.S. § 20-259.01. Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals, Division One, found the subject endorsement in derogation of the Arizona uninsured motorist…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Prosk v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Brian D. PateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1990
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.