Legal Opinion
Allen v. McMillion
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1978No. Civ. 50651PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, Acting P. J.
The genesis of this litigation is a real property boundary dispute. The property of plaintiffs, the Allens, was separated from that of defendants, the McMillions, by a chain link fence and foliage growing along it. The fence had been in place when the Allens purchased the property, and they understood it marked the property boundary. The McMillions had their property surveyed and discovered that the fence was four feet in from the property line on their property. They announced to Mr. Allen their intention to remove the fence and foliage. The Allens contacted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Reeder v. PurdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Empire Gold Mining Co. v. Bonanza Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Staples v. HoefkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Legarra v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Smith v. Cap Concrete, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Appel v. BurmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.