Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1987No. 16562PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal presents an issue of insurance coverage. The policy states that the insurer will pay an insured’s loss if he is “hit” or “struck” by a motor vehicle. The insured seeks compensation for injuries he suffered when a horse reacted in fright to a passing truck. The insurer has denied coverage. The case comes to us on appeal from summary judgment in favor of the insurer. We affirm.

Our analysis begins by reciting the standard of review. When summary judgment has been entered below, we must decide whether there exist genuine issues of material fact and, if not, whether the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. LambIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Plauche v. Consolidated CompaniesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Lawrence v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Ferega v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Maness v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guzman v. Allstate Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1991
  2. Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Dahmen v. LM General InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
  4. Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. RLI Insurance Company v. BarnesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API